Comments on: Halo 3: Why Does It Have To Be Great?…The Facts Unveiled.

By: Ephedrine.

Ephedrine. — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:34:02 +0000

What do you make ephedrine out of….

Ephedrine to buy. Homemade ephedrine….

By: The Showdown: Halo 3 vs SOCOM | PS3 | Your Recommended Daily Dose Of Technology!

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:48:17 +0000

[...] If you want reasons specific to why Halo 3 is better then you should read my previous article detailing why it is a must sell for microsoft. [...]

By: Xbox » Halo 3: Why Does It Have To Be Great?…The Facts Unveiled.

Xbox » Halo 3: Why Does It Have To Be Great?…The Facts Unveiled. — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:33:40 +0000

[...] Bruce wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptWe all must have heard about Halo 1 or Halo 2, they where more or less the best selling games for the original Xbox console with millions of sales and new subscriptions to xbox live, infact there still are players on halo 2 online and … [...]

By: Controversy Creates Traffic! | Site News | The Technology & Console Blog

Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:27:47 +0000

[...] and then it gets featured on the website as part of their daily news. Someone obviously submitted this article and it created a buzz and sent lots of traffic here and guess what? The server crashed! I think if [...]

By: josephah2000

josephah2000 — Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:12:32 +0000

Whether or not PS3 is graphically superior is arguable to the end of time. In my opinion, most games in comparison look better on the the 360 (due to porting) but honestly there is not much of a difference, just like there wasn’t much of a diffence with ps2 and xbox.

What matters in the end is the amount of games available. 360 has a huge advantage. Don’t forget about EA games are double the frame rate of ps3. And of course Halo3. As long as 360 keeps selling more consoles and landing huge titles, in other words doing the same, all will be well. Halo3 will guarantee that for the next 2 years. Developers will continue to make games specifically for the 360 which will be graphically superior to ps3.

By: Abdalla Ahmed

Abdalla Ahmed — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:47:20 +0000

Interesting, I will have to look into it.

By: Death Jag

Death Jag — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:24:25 +0000

Ok,
I would like to point out this comment:
“Sony’s graphically superior PlayStation 3″
I am so tired of hearing this statement. I dont know where this flawed logic comes from or why people believe it so blindly. The Xbox 360 IS NOT A WEAK console in terms of graphical horsepower. The fact is that the PS3 is not up to next gen par which is why the games dont look and more importantly run as well as thier xbox 360 counter parts. The GPUS inside the consoles are very different the ATI GPU is the most powerful one on the market even vs. the high-end PC GPUs while the PS3 GPU is a 7800GTX (more or less) that is outdated technology. The Cell on the PS3 CANNOT RENDER DX 9.0c GRAPHICS!
-Death Jag(XBL)

By: ghumra

ghumra — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:01:08 +0000

yeh ps3 has got better graphics but as u all know we have halo which will top the ps3 sales for jokes

By: Abdalla Ahmed

Abdalla Ahmed — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:55:24 +0000

Im pretty sure the PS3 is superior graphically but thats its not achieving its potential. Also, Incase you have forgotten, I am an Xbox 360 Fan Boy

By: xXdEVILsXx

xXdEVILsXx — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:31:55 +0000

There is not one game that is graphically superior to the 360. Lair sucks and the graphics are horrible. The ps3 was built with a faster processor…not graphics card.